Indoubtbigtime, I am stunned that you have a number of beliefs regarding NASA which you claim to have. Wow.
Regarding NASA's moon landings, they were said to have happened from 1969 into the early 1970s. NASA does not say they all happened in the 1960s. I remember that when I was a very young child I watched one of the moon landings and saw the astronauts step out onto the moon and walk upon it. I saw it in a live television national network news broadcast (and thus from ABC, CBS, or NBC news). [But the news network probably picked up the broadcast from the moon with the aide of NASA relaying a reception of it to the network.] That left a tremendous impression upon me.
Regarding solar eclipses, if by matching up perfectly you mean in regards to alignment, then I agree with you. But I am sure you also know that many solar eclipses are not total eclipses, but instead only partial eclipses and thus the partial eclipses don't line up perfectly. If you mean the moon is just the right size to block out the sun during an eclipse, neither much bigger than needed nor too small, then I disagree that such has always been the case during the entire time the moon has existed.
Regarding the pictures of Mars I am totally shocked that you believe what you do about it. I don't see how anyone could disbelieve that such pictures are true and that NASA lies about Mars, unless they reject so much of modern science and of modern technology. Is it that so many of the pictures of Mars look a lot like that of dry desserts of parts of Earth (but without any plants), other than that the Mars color pictures show the landscape as being red or reddish? Is that why you think the pictures of Mars are really of Earth through a red filter?
Regarding the missing link between ape and men, there were none with features exactly half way between modern day apes and men in every feature of a skull. That is because of number of things. Humans did not evolve from any of the modern day apes, instead humans evolved from a long extinct species of apes. That is what evolutionists say, and Charles Darwin never said humans evolved from a modern species ape. Likewise to my knowledge no scientist of evolution ever said humans evolved form a modern species of ape. For example, to my knowledge they never said we evolved from a common chimpanzee, a bonobo (also called a pygmy chimpanzee), a gorilla, or an orangutan. Instead the evolutionist scientists say (and Charles Darwin said) we share a common ancestor with the modern apes. Furthermore, for at least the past several decades they say that some skull features evolved before other skull features. At a result there was never a skull in which all of it features were exactly half way between an ape (with a modern species or an extinct species) and a modern human skull. Likewise other parts of the skeleton evolved towards human-like features before other parts did.
Regarding other types of animals, it is true that many types alive today look exactly the same as ones which lived long ago (including ones which scientists say lived tens of millions of years ago, and in some cases maybe hundreds of millions ago, as determined by their fossils). Some types of life have not evolved much in the past many millions of years, but others have (or as a result of evolution have distant descendant species which are very different from them).